Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Great email question about Shelby's lawyers
fire shelby

Date:
Great email question about Shelby's lawyers
Permalink Closed


Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:01:13 -0800 (PST)


 From:  XXXX@yahoo.com


Subject: lawyers


To: fireshelby@yahoo.com  


Wait a minute...I'm confused...Shelby Thames and the Board have both stressed the importance of objectivity and fairness....yet, who did Thames appoint to investiage claims that Dvorak falsified information on her resume?  Her husband's former law partner???  Now who is the board appoint to make sure the USM hearing on the two fired professors is fair???  A lawyer who is representing Shelby Thames in other matters?  What am I missing here?!?!?!


***********************************


 



__________________
outside observer

Date:
Permalink Closed

It seems to me, that with all the nationa, if not international, interest in this case, that the board would do everything it could to avoid even the slightest appearance of a conflict of interest.  If the lawyer appointed by the board to "ensure the fairness of the professor's hearing" is in fact representing Shelby Thames in other cases, how can he possibly be an impartial observer?

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard