Letter to the Editor: Crisis damages USM’s academic reputation
[published in April 8 edition of Student Printz]
As an outside observer who is following the current controversy on your campus from a distance, I am not sure that all USM students truly understand the serious impact this affair may have on their individual futures.
Thanks to the actions of President Thames, the reputation of the university has already been severely damaged in the eyes of academics around the country. This is true not only because of the abrupt firings of two highly-respected professors but also because those firings have helped call attention to many other aspects of USM that look highly peculiar to unjaundiced eyes. (For a full list of these peculiarities, visit the Web site www.geocities.com/fireshelby.)
How will this mess affect the future of USM students? Well, any students applying to graduate or professional schools will discover that their degrees are taken much less seriously now than they were a few years ago. The university is on the verge of losing its reputation as a serious place of higher education. USM will also have difficulty attracting and retaining top faculty members, and this fact will also have a negative long-term impact on the futures of USM students. Why would any serious professor volunteer to come to a campus where his job was at risk if he simply dared to raise questions about the wisdom of presidential decisions and appointments? Why would any professor want to stay at such a place if he had the chance to leave?
Finally, for all the reasons mentioned above, USM will have difficulty attracting and retaining the best graduate students - the people who often have the closest day-to-day classroom contact with freshmen and sophomores and who are crucial in building the basic skills of entering students.
In short, the current crisis at USM will affect students far more than it will ultimately affect Professors Glamser or Stringer or President Thames. The two professors will easily be able to find jobs elsewhere (not only because they are highly distinguished faculty but because they are now regarded as martyrs for academic freedom). President Thames, no matter what happens, will retire with a very comfortable income. Only the students and remaining faculty at USM will suffer the long-term consequences of President Thames' hasty and ill-considered actions.
Of course, it is not too late to turn this whole situation around and make USM look very good in the eyes of the rest of the country. Achieving that outcome, however, will require students to take an active role in voicing their concerns about the firings of the two professors and the various peculiarities described on the Web site mentioned above.
Robert C. Evans Professor of English Auburn University Montgomery
As a highly concerned student at USM, I have taken very seriously the recent events that are unfolding. I have become increasingly concerned over the past month that this totalitarian regime (Thames and friends) will continue to run our university into the ground. Shelby Thames has said repeatedly that the students are his highest concern. On the contrary, the validity and respect of the degree I will earn is on the line, and he has shown that he is willing to throw it away. It is known that Thames wishes to treat this university as a buisness moreso than a place of higher learning. Unfortunately, the IHL appointed him president knowing the possible catastrophe. These members of the board are mainly pro-Thames, supporting anything that will keep other state universities ahead. The troubling fact is that the board has the final decision in their hands with regards to both the professors as well as Thames. I have gone out and protested when I saw the opportunity and wrote every member of the MS IHL Board, letting them know that I will be applying to grad school in another year and that no university in MS will likely recieve even a requeat for an application from me. I strongly encourage all students who hope to graduate with a degree from USM to continue the fight, for the sake of their future degree, as well as for the professors. I also encourage alumni of USM to speak out against Thames and encourage his removal from the USM administration.
It is very encouraging to see that professors at other universities notice and acknoledge the current crisis we are facing and we greatly appreciate the support.