Here's my response to Lisa from the "HOT NEWS" thread:

From the Hattiesburg American article:

"What's different today than in November?" Mader said. "I think the timing of this vote is suspect. Why rescind the approval this week?"

Truth responsds:  Dear Lisa, what's different between today and November 2003 is that today people are finally taking a good hard look at Angie's credentials and are finding them lacking.  Bottom line, the woman has never had tenure at any four-year university.  Ever.  What she had was tenure at a COMMUNITY COLLEGE with a "special dispensation" to say that she was tenured at UK (though she NEVER went through the tenure and promotion process at UK and has said so herself). 

Mader said it appears there is a campaign against Dvorak which she said is "very misdirected and inappropriate in light of the fact that the allegations against her proved to be false."

Truth responds:  the only campaign against Dvorak is the one the Dome has *fabricated* through its own spin.  Dvorak has "pumped up" her CV so much that it has finally burst.  The allegations against her have NOT been proven false; quite to the contrary, they have been proven true.

Ah, the truth does hurt...