A University of Southern Mississippi English professor who has read most of vice president Angie Dvorak’s published writings says the university senior administrator’s scholarly work falls well below what is usually expected for academics seeking tenure at USM.
“Altogether she published 26 printed pages of material between her achievement of a Ph.D. in 1989 and the present day,” said English professor Anne Wallace, who has read three of the five articles Dvorak said she has published. “In a major literary journal, articles normally run from 20 to 30 pages, a single article. So that’s a very small amount of text.”
Dvorak likely would not have received tenure in USM’s English Department, said Wallace.
“This work is perfectly competent for what it purports to be,” Wallace said Thursday. “But it does not match what we would be looking for if we were reviewing her credentials if we were looking to tenure her in our own department.
“It would have been a very, very hard sell on the part of the administration to make us tenure her in this department,” she added.
quote: Originally posted by: truth4usm "Well said, Anne Wallace!"
And didn't she just lose her graduate faculty status in the College of Business and Economic Development?
I guess it doesn't matter because during Shelby's testimony the other day, he said he hired her "as a manager". Other than 1/3 of Kenbot, who and what does she manage?
Angie Dvorak and the USM faculty remain at an impasse.
If she is allowed to remain in her position after lying on her vita, and being grossly unqualified for a significant portion of her official duties, there is no hope for USM.
quote: Originally posted by: Robert Campbell "This story needs to stay active. Angie Dvorak and the USM faculty remain at an impasse. If she is allowed to remain in her position after lying on her vita, and being grossly unqualified for a significant portion of her official duties, there is no hope for USM. Robert Campbell"
facsen still has an ongoing inquiry that is presently at an impasse due to her refusal to give an ad hoc committee an advance preview of her cv before meeting with her. But it certainly isn't a dead issue.
Why doesn't the Faculty Senate committee force the issue, by making a public statement that Angie Dvorak's refusal to allow them to see the vita she submitted at the time of hiring is unacceptable.
A vita is not a confidential document. Never was, never will be. It's that simple.
Besides, one of the intercepted emails that Thames was reading out loud on Wednesday (1/14/04 from a senior English professor at the University of Kentucky) made it clear that she was not tenured in that department.
Publicize that information--and demand that she respond to it.
quote: Originally posted by: Robert Campbell "Why doesn't the Faculty Senate committee force the issue, by making a public statement that Angie Dvorak's refusal to allow them to see the vita she submitted at the time of hiring is unacceptable. A vita is not a confidential document. Never was, never will be. It's that simple. Besides, one of the intercepted emails that Thames was reading out loud on Wednesday (1/14/04 from a senior English professor at the University of Kentucky) made it clear that she was not tenured in that department. Publicize that information--and demand that she respond to it. Robert Campbell "
Thanks Robert. This is sound advice and i will make a case with it. I know you understand the difficulties attendent at the end of the semester . . . but you are absolutely right -- we need to grow teeth.