Details of the settlement between the University of Southern Mississippi and professors Gary Stringer and Frank Glamser include:
- The university will recommend Angie Dvorak, vice president of research and economic development, will not pursue litigation against the professors.
Angie Dvorak was "not a party to the proceedings" and as to her personal rights cannot be bound by the settlement agreement. This provision simply recognizes that fact. Nevertheless, she would be a fool indeed if she pursued litigation against Professors Stringer and Glamser. Her chances of prevailing would be miniscule (that fact is reflected in the collapse of the "prosecution") and the actual effect would be to keep her own professional conduct under the microscope for years, something it would seem inadvisable to do, especially if there is more potential controversy which remains beneath the surface.
- The university will withdraw its termination proceedings against the professors.
The effect is as if it never existed. The termination proceedings were terminated: the professors won and they were compensated for this unwarranted and inexcusable disruption of their professional and personal lives.
- The professors will be reinstated for two years. During those two years the professors can convert to consultants if they want.
The Board here is in effect saying it a second time. The termination procedure failed. The professors are "reinstated". The professors may retire with consultant status if they wish. They are not required to. It is their choice, not the administration's.
- The university will support Stringer’s research project and will not oppose a request if he transfers the project to another institution.
Dr. Stringer's distinguished Donne project will continue as before with a guarantee of no interference by the Administration. What university, in fact, would disrupt a project as internationally respected as this one?
- The professors agree the university will not provide office facilities or supplies on campus.
If I am not mistaken the Donne project will have an office according to the terms of its grant.
- The professors will not publicly criticize the administration.
A settlement is a settlement, not a continuation of combat. It binds, of course, only the parties, not the rest of the concerned faculty and students.
- The professors will be allowed to remove their personal material from their campus offices.
- The professors will be compensated at their current nine-month salaries. At the end of the 2005-2006 school year, any obligations of employment will have been satisfied.
President Thames' purpose in the discharge proceedings was immediate and definitive termination of the contractual relationship. No spin can obscure the fact that these proceedings were a failure for President Thames. The contractual relationship continues but in a form freely negotiated by the parties. In two years the parties have no further obligations to each other, but this does not mean that new relationships could not be forged at that time if circumstances on campus are by then changed and the parties are so inclined. A wiser administration would, of course, eagerly invite these two professors to continue contributing to the restoration of peace, harmony, and integrity at USM.
In effect the two years of salary awarded to the men who were supposed to be being fired is indistinguishable from an award of damages for what they have been gratuitously put through. It is inconceivable that this can be seen as a victory for the administration.
I see here on this board a small tendency to think that Drs. Stringer and Glamser should on principle have refused to settle their differences with the University President. No one, however, can expect any individuals and their families to bear such crushing stress and personal sacrifice indefinitely.The issues involved are campus-wide and affect every student and faculty member. It is obvious that it is not over and that the students and faculty need to move on in the effort to salvage the reputation and well-being of USM. It is even more obvious that nearly everyone owes a debt of gratitude to Gary Stringer and Frank Glamser for their guts and determination to do the right thing in the first place and in standing up so courageously to such awful pressure. Would that we were all that strong.
I won't consider retirement in 2 years to be Glamser and Stringer's idea unless they say it was. Otherwise it's a condition imposed on them by Thames or by the Board.
I understand also that neither will be doing any teaching or having any contact with students...again, I question whether this was their idea.
It's true that they haven't been fired, and neither Thames nor his successor, if they have any sense, will try to fire tenured faculty on the purported grounds that were used against G & S.
But the Thames administration has effectively muzzled two of its vocal and influential critics, who did their jobs and deserve nothing short of full reinstatement. It puts other limitations on their activities that will signal to everyone how Thames and company has been able to damage and confine them.
I don't blame either professor for taking the settlement--I have known other professors who were fighting power-mad administrators, facing major stress and big legal bills, and were happy to take a sweetened retirement deal and leave. But Thames has gotten away with too much here, and those looking to get rid of tenured faculty who annoy them will notice this as well.
In my opinion, Thames has gotten away with too much in this case, even if he is the next to be pushed into retirement, and his retirement begins right away.
Meanwhile, I do have to wonder about the Board's time horizons. If the Board isn't planning to push Thames out, what on earth does it think is going to happen at USM over the next few months?
Unless you have used the court system to defend yourself when you are not involved in criminal activity - you'd never know how demoralizing and degrading it is - especially when you're appealing or suing these silly Elitists who have time, money, and local power on there side.