ssns release a crime...

Date: May 3, 2004

ssns release a crime...

Date: May 3, 2004

Glamser and Stringer were never even accused of a crime in the charges. That is something Thames pushed in the media for a month saying wait until the facts come out. They came out last Wednesday and it doesn't seem to matter to the Thames minions. Klumb was obviously trashing those guys to make Thames look justified. People on the Thames team do not have to follow the rules, only everybody else.

Date: May 3, 2004

quote:
Originally posted by: doc candidate
"If Drs. Glamser and Stringer have been accused of a crime of releasing Dvorak's social security number, what about Lisa Mader? Didn't she do the same thing when she had Dvorak's social security number on WDAM? "

Actually, only one of the two professors was accused of releasing the SSN number. He was actually giving it to someone in Human Resources who already had that information (as a Human Resources employee) AND had already given the professor the info he requested prior to even having the SSN. Lisa Mader released it to WDAM who certainly did not already have that information. I haven't heard Thames call her a criminal in the press!

Date: May 3, 2004

quote:
Originally posted by: Missi
"Actually, only one of the two professors was accused of releasing the SSN number. He was actually giving it to someone in Human Resources who already had that information (as a Human Resources employee) AND had already given the professor the info he requested prior to even having the SSN. Lisa Mader released it to WDAM who certainly did not already have that information. I haven't heard Thames call her a criminal in the press!"

You need to bombard shelby, lisa M. and Roy Klumb with emails and letters . . .

NO QUARTER

Date: May 3, 2004

On a previous thread, it was pointed out that obtaining someone else's Social Security Number is not a crime. (Using it in order to pretend to be that person is a crime, but even Roy Klumb doesn't really think that G and S were impersonating Angie Dvorak.)

As I said way back when this message board was new, if Thames and his henchcrew really had a basis for criminal prosecution, they'd have referred the matter to the District Attorney's office immediately.

Robert Campbell