I've been noticing a rising tide of despair in many postings. This is a marathon not a sprint. The following from Chinua Achebe's great novel of systemic corruption and individual resistance to it, Anthills of the Savanna (1988), seems appropriate for USM (p.2).
"I have thought of all this as a game that began innocently enough and then went suddenly strange and poisonous. But I may prove to be too sanguine even in that. For, if I am right, then looking back on the last two years it should be possible to point to a specific and decisive event and say: it was such and such a point that everything went wrong and the rules were suspended. But I have not found such a moment or such a cause although I have sought hard and long for it. And so it begins to seem to me that this thing probably never was a game, that the present was there from the very beginning only I was too blind or too busy to notice. But the real question which I have often asked myself is why then do I go on with it now that I can see. I don't know. Simple inertia, maybe. Or perhaps sheer curiosity: to see where it will all ... well, end."
Any thoughts?
p.s. I have prepared a long piece (ca.1,000) words comparing SFT's delusional assertion that USM is already a "worl'-class" university, with the reality here under his Admin. Of 8 points, perhaps USM gets 2 or 3 at the best (i.e., a grade of F). Should I post it?
Please do post it; your writings have been some of the best on this board, which is saying a lot since this board is full of good stuff (e.g., by Jim Hollandsworth, Noel Polk, and others).
Meanwhile, I would be very curious to know: are there and specific reasons that YOU feel optimistic? I suspect that there may indeed be grounds for optimism (at least in the long term), but you are much closer to the situation, so I would appreciate your thoughts.
quote: Originally posted by: Doug Chambers "Ok, thanks, sounds like there is interest - I am in the middle of grading but will take a break in a bit and type it all in. cheers."
Yep -- you are right on there Doug. We can't invest too much in any one moment -- this conflict will be won in the accretion of small conflicts that form the backdrop of a continual climate of unrest. At some point that unrest will no longer be able to be addressed by sensitivity workshops, feel-good committees; and private behind the scenes meetings. The source of the unrest is in the person of our President who is incapable of substantial change.
The university is too much of an economic engine in this part of the state to be allowed to go down. At some point keeping Shelby on will be a greater liability than change.
I think we aren't all that far away. There are not many more moves that the administration can make. It's most recent actions are desperate but without much substance --
the administration is about to lose control of the new counsel it just put together.
It has thoroughly alienated the Senate and has just managed in the last twenty four hours to shoot itself in the foot yet again.
Academic Council and Grad Council are only performing the operations they are required to perform . . .
Some big guns in town have shifted alliances and others are moving to the fence.
The Board is watching closely . . . and is pretty polarized at this point.
Even the Deans are not firmly in his camp right now . . .
I'm not a prognosticator but I have seen two Presidents fall before this and the signs are there . . . . the administration is deeply wounded. I'll admit this administration has an amazing resiliency . . . .
This is the time for patience, for faith and for resolve.
I agree with P.P. that we must be realistic and be prepared for ups and downs without falling into despair or burning-out. Apparently SFT has often in the past simply outlasted his opponents, wore them out; clearly has a huge huge will (but no doubt a small small something else, hehehe). But he is a fool. He reminds me of the sort of tinpot local tyrant, a town chief in say Nigeria under military government, in which the provincial colonels prop him up. But, he is not - and this little world here is supposed to be a republic ('of letters'). Unlike SFT, we have to keep it up.
quote: Originally posted by: Doug Chambers "I agree with P.P. that we must be realistic and be prepared for ups and downs without falling into despair or burning-out. Apparently SFT has often in the past simply outlasted his opponents, wore them out; clearly has a huge huge will (but no doubt a small small something else, hehehe). But he is a fool. He reminds me of the sort of tinpot local tyrant, a town chief in say Nigeria under military government, in which the provincial colonels prop him up. But, he is not - and this little world here is supposed to be a republic ('of letters'). Unlike SFT, we have to keep it up."
Spok'n like the passionate but patient stalker of fools and wilde beasties I know ye to be!
Keep it up Doug. We are getting enough great writing on this Board to put a book together.
When this is over . . . all this wiritng will be our roadmap to creating a great (well . . . future great) university . . . maybe.