The most 'commercially viable' education is a well-rounded one

Recently there has been a great deal of discussion about making USM more commercially viable. I certainly understand the desire to make the university a resource for economic development, but am confused about the approach used to reach this goal. Perhaps those in the university administration and state government who have a much deeper understanding of the situation can determine which departments and courses are commercially viable and which are not. I am unable to do that.

Since graduating from USM over 25 years ago I have had the good fortune to work in a variety of industrial positions throughout the country and around the world. I feel my education at USM served me well, but I have trouble making a distinction as to which courses had commercial value. I cannot determine in which classes I learned how to identify problems, organize information, understand opposing viewpoints, communicate effectively, work with people from diverse cultures, and find efficient and ethical solutions. The entire curriculum was important in my professional development, service to communities, and appreciation of all life has to offer.

I am glad I had a complete university education at USM. I am grateful the curriculum was designed and taught by faculty members who were expert in their fields, who cared about me as a person and as a future citizen, who worked long hours to teach, to grade papers, and to advise me. They understood the larger purposes of an education.

It will be very unfortunate if the direction of the university is diverted from providing a rewarding learning experience that lasts a lifetime to satisfying the current whim of a changing marketplace.

ROBERT D. JORDAN
Project manager, BP Chemicals
Decatur, Ala.