My risk manager (a house elf) just told me that he submitted an article about the email debacle to Slashdot.org for consideration in the "Your Rights Online" section. He was very proud.
After I reminded my RM that if the article is accepted the USM, Hattiesburg American, Sun-Herald, Clarion-Ledger & AAUP websites were likely to be hammered by the slashdot effect (i.e., grievously overloaded by drooling geek hordes & stray propeller heads), he began smashing his head with a lamp & shouting "Bad Doty! Bad Doty!"
quote: Originally posted by: Invictus "My risk manager (a house elf) just told me that he submitted an article about the email debacle to Slashdot.org for consideration in the "Your Rights Online" section. He was very proud. After I reminded my RM that if the article is accepted the USM, Hattiesburg American, Sun-Herald, Clarion-Ledger & AAUP websites were likely to be hammered by the slashdot effect (i.e., grievously overloaded by drooling geek hordes & stray propeller heads), he began smashing his head with a lamp & shouting "Bad Doty! Bad Doty!" I'll let y'all know if it's accepted. "
Good news. Slashdot rejected the story. My risk manager, the house elf, is now off the hook for putting all those websites at risk of being clobbered by the pocket protector crowd.