After your riveting expose on the true nature of the Hood/Keith "evolution", and the off angle coverage by the press, I can see why you may be drained and shallow. I'd be.
That was a superb piece of work. Surely our IRs looking on will see that as a pattern.
I am right now updating the Dana Thames Report with screen shots to demonstrate what her website looked like on March 21, before she edited on March 29 to more closely (but not absolutely) reflect the truth about her department.