Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: UPDATE! What's happening right now!!
legal fiction

Date:
RE: UPDATE! What's happening right now!!
Permalink Closed


Very Ambiguous final remarks. . however, I would still suggest that IF if was necessary for the professors to disprove the evidence presented against them in the testimony of SFT, they would have been given the opportunity to do so.  This obviously would include the cross-examination of Thames himself.  What their own testimony seems to have done was "fill in the gaps" and resolve some of the issues raised by this morning's testimony -- I don't think it was ONLY in the interest of their own academic integrity as Yippee would suggest (though like others have said, he is entited to his own opinion).

__________________
truth4usm

Date:
Permalink Closed

GS talks about faculty honor code.


McD: Did you think you were going to get fired for expressing your opinion?


GS: no.


Reuben Anderson:  There will be a recommendation made today to the IHL.  The contents will not be made public until the IHL accepts the recommendation.  The bottom line is that no one will make any statements to the media. 


4:14 p.m. CST--stand in recess.



__________________
aghast

Date:
Permalink Closed

Maybe someone who is there will show up soon to at least tell us who is coming out of the room with smiling faces.

__________________
truth4usm

Date:
Permalink Closed

And now WUSM is playing Elvis singing "Your Cheatin' Heart"!!!!!! Gotta love those guys!

__________________
Yippee

Date:
Permalink Closed

Truth,


You must not have been listening this morning.  Perhaps you just can't handle the truth!



__________________
cracked

Date:
Permalink Closed

on and on like a broken record.



__________________
aghast

Date:
Permalink Closed

I can't believe they tried to make an issue of Stringer's comment about the student. I did understand correctly that this was in a private email, didn't I? He revealed no confidential information. And if it is illegal for professors to mock students in private and/or for students to mock professors in private, God help us all.

__________________
ed

Date:
Permalink Closed

to those of you who heard/watched the testimonies,  What is your guess as to Anderson's recommendation?


 



__________________
DCeagle

Date:
Permalink Closed

Yipee,


If you do know what was agreed upon (which I doubt), you or whoever gave you the information must be in violation of both the Judge's order not to comment publically and probably an express obligation under the settlement agreement to not disclose the result.  So either you are lying or you in violation of some obligation to maintain the confidential nature of the information.  This seems to make you just as reprehensible as you claim the professors have been.



__________________
Flash Gordon

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: StormyMS

"I believe there was an affidavit from Pamela Standridge at WDAM that Dvorak's social security number was plainly printed on information given to her by Lisa Mader, USM PR person."


I guess she'll be in big trouble now. Not!

__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard