Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Media coverage yesterday and today
friend

Date:
Media coverage yesterday and today
Permalink Closed


I was browsing around and saw Matt Hinton's article in the 4/29/04 Student Printz that says the media at the hearing was "strictly local."  How accurate is his perception?


Assuming it is accurate, why is the popular media not jumping on this story? Even though they love to play the anti-intellectual populist card, you'd think they could find an audience with this story. Even more puzzling, why is the national academic media letting things pass without comment? 



__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
Permalink Closed

Your last question is one that is puzzling me, as well.  What was revealed in Hattiesburg on Wednesday -- especially about e-mail snooping -- has HUGE implications for faculty everywhere.  Academe, which should be a refuge of the mind and an area protected for free thought, now seems in danger of being one of the most heavily policed areas in modern society, if only because e-mail and computers are so prevalent there.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1140
Date:
Permalink Closed

The Chronicle is going to publish a follow-up.


 



__________________
friend

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by:

"The Chronicle is going to publish a follow-up.  "

Thanks. That's good to know.


__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard