Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Fire Shelby Thames -> Fire Shelby Thames -> Fire Shelby Thames -> Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of...
Post Info TOPIC: Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of...
Fire Shelby


Status: Offline
Posts: 1140
Date:
Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of...
Permalink Closed

...the settlement agreement been reported to the appropriate authorities? 


I know the two profs can't comment, but what about others in the know?


If he has violated the agreement, what kind of punitive arrangements were made? 


Do not give in to this tyrannical bastard.  


I say report every single one of his violations.


 



__________________
Tiger

Date:
Permalink Closed

I actually started a thread called Thames broke agreement where I started posting all his quotes that may be violations. By now it has been bumped to page 2, but I would like to remind eveyone to add any other quotes they find to it!!!

__________________
Missi

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by:
"...the settlement agreement been reported to the appropriate authorities?   "
I would love to hear what Justice Andersen would say!

__________________
educator

Date:
Permalink Closed

bumped back up to the front line.

__________________
Fire Shelby


Status: Offline
Posts: 1140
Date:
Permalink Closed


quote:

Originally posted by: Tiger
"I actually started a thread called Thames broke agreement where I started posting all his quotes that may be violations. By now it has been bumped to page 2, but I would like to remind eveyone to add any other quotes they find to it!!!"


Let's ALL continue to keep record of his violations.  Link all violations to the thread, and we will have evidence to present.


Frank and Gary, if you are listening, please don't let him get away with this.  You two have behaved as gentlemen throughout this whole ordeal.  Take off the gloves and force him to uphold his agreement or see that he is punished for violating it.


 



__________________
Hellgirl

Date:
Permalink Closed

Originally posted by Fire Shelby:


"Frank and Gary, if you are listening, please don't let him get away with this.  You two have behaved as gentlemen throughout this whole ordeal.  Take off the gloves and force him to uphold his agreement or see that he is punished for violating it."


And, Frank and Gary, if you can confront him on this, me and others that I know will be with you all the way. Again, congratulations on the settlement.

__________________
RealityCheck

Date:
RE: Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of
Permalink Closed

Justice Anderson was given a settlement, verbatim, from the IHL to get any way he could from both parties.

He is comfortable in corporate America now, and seems to have no interest in civil rights violations. Plus, he did this for free.

He was the front man for the IHL that the other side would accept as "fair" and he did his job.

He could give a *^$#( if Thames violated the agreement 100 times. As long as he goes not further than he did, SFT can do this a lot and Anderson will never say a thing.

It is wrong but that is the way it is in big power politics

Those who thought Anderson had any "ties" to his civil rights days were sadly mistaken. He is the IHL guy all the way.

__________________
ram

Date:
RE: Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of...
Permalink Closed

"8. The parties agree to refrain from making public comments about this agreement until final approval by the Board. The parties agree not to make any public comments about this agreement designed to reflect negatively on the opposing party. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Hearing Officer will make certain detailed statements to the media regarding this agreement."


Okay, we can totally eliminate the first and last sentences. The second sentence turns about a question of intent. No party (I forget exactly, but I'd guess SFT, GS, and FG, but maybe IHL board and others?) can make a public comment DESIGNED to reflect negatively.  That's going to be a question of fact.  Neither you nor I can say what SFT (nor GS nor FG) "designed" when they said something. 


Don't get me wrong, I think SFT will whine and manipulate, but it is not just a matter of saying "Gotcha!" and he will have to do the right thing.  GS or FG or both of them would have to start some type of enforcement proceeding and that means time and expense and a whole lot of grief.  Somebody would have to say something pretty egregious for another party to actually take action under provision 8. 


Naturally, the men of character are less likely to violate this provision than is the toad.  Oops, my bias is showing. 



__________________
Robert Campbell

Date:
Permalink Closed

The intent is blatant, when the settlement prevented Thames from firing G and S, yet he came right and said they deserved to be fired.


But there's no presiding judge in this case.  It's not like a settlement to a civil suit.


There's just the IHL Board, which keeps dodging its responsibilities.


Robert Campbell



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Fire Shelby Thames -> Fire Shelby Thames -> Fire Shelby Thames -> Question: Has Shelby's vioation of clause 8 of...
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard