So I want to open this thread by asking for input on the kind of characteristics, personal and professional, that we want to see in our next President.
Once the administration goes down a search will be put together. We all know what has happened in the last search. I think it is critical that faculty, staff and students put together a list of things we want (separate according to constituency or unified).
And we need to press the Board to make sure that this is a genuine search and that those three groups have a genuine and powerful influence on helping to determine both the pool and the final result.
quote: Originally posted by: "Someone who walks across campus, among faculty and students, without being flanked by UPD escorts."
These are good . . . . but let's see if we can find a way to write them as things that can go into a job description, either as personal or professional characteristics . . .
For instance:
"Someone who has travelled widely and has broad international experience."
(incidently, that was not a plug for Hudson . . . )
A president whose history indicates complete fairness in the administration of all colleges. A president who doesn't favor one academic discipline simply because that is from where s/he emerged.
A president who is skilled at bringing in outside funding to the university but who will not sell the university's soul to the highest bidder.
A president who has no "bootyology" scandals in his/her closet--no whiff of taint.
A real "renaissance man/woman" who has wide and varied interests, skills, documented through his/her CV.
A president whose "open door" policy at his/her current university is verifiable.
A president who, when asked, "Do you know Shelby Thames and Angie Dvorak?" responds, "Who?"
Another thing to look for is TIME SPENT IN THE CLASSROOM. A University is a multi-faceted corporation when you come down to it. A president's ability to bring in funds for all departments is important for the growth of the university. BUT, what is the primary mission of a university? Interaction between student and teacher. And the teacher's ability to use university funded resource programs for education, to teach the students. Not strictly to patent a certain new kind of chemical or paint or plastic. These things have wonderful commercial application and many of these do come out of universities and that is wonderful. But a university is more than that. The Medici Family were bankers by trade. But with their wealth, they supported the ARTS.
A president who is willing to support the faculty in maintaining high academic standards (for both students and for themselves).
A president who values ideas, not just money. A president who realizes the cultural values a university brings to southern Mississippi, not just the "economic development."
A president who values diversity among the students, faculty and staff, and maintains fairness in hiring practices across the university.
USM deserves the kind of President that is loyal and passionate about the vision of an international university. USM needs an introspective President that looks at the student body and challenges faculty to develop academic classes to enhance the potential of all who love intellectual discovery. USM demands a President whose first option of discourse is communication not litigation. Students at this university should know that when they see anyone in the Administration that they should have no fear for their rights and freedoms. The kind of President that would inspire others to lead recognizes that a sober, humble, and open mind promotes a healthy, energetic body.
Fear as a first weapon represents a corrosion in character for those that command it. Fear doesn't live here anymore.
Speaking as an alumnus, I think a president should have the basic management skills necessary to develop a shared sense of the mission of the University, not just the "what" but also the "how." Top-down, authoritarian management simply doesn't work nowadays, except perhaps in sawmills. Why do you think "shared governance" has been a battle cry throughout this mess?
A president should have a modicum of personal charisma. Instead of repelling people with different viewpoints, the president should attract them like a magnet, taking that diverse input to forge real strategic & operational plans.
quote: Originally posted by: Invictus "Speaking as an alumnus, I think a president should have the basic management skills necessary to develop a shared sense of the mission of the University, not just the "what" but also the "how." Top-down, authoritarian management simply doesn't work nowadays, except perhaps in sawmills. Why do you think "shared governance" has been a battle cry throughout this mess? A president should have a modicum of personal charisma. Instead of repelling people with different viewpoints, the president should attract them like a magnet, taking that diverse input to forge real strategic & operational plans. "
Wow, just popped in while looking for another thread and I discovered people have actually been commenting here. Thanks everyone. You never know where some of these ideas will end up!