Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Suacier, Shelby and Aubrey: KEY point!
Grey Knight

Date:
Suacier, Shelby and Aubrey: KEY point!
Permalink Closed


At the bottom I have copied a salient portion of Gene Saucier's letter in Sunday's HA.


One of the things I was waiting to see if anyone would make a comment on was the real tragedy of AKL and his lack of leadership for USM. And one of the reasons I think Shelby 'owns' Aubrey, even back then. Aubrey gave his word that Shelby would not be allow to retaliate against the Deans and VP's. Yet, according to Gene Saucier, Shelby had free reign to spew his venom. Aubrey did nothing to protect these people even after he had given them his guarantee.


 


 


At the close of the discussion Dr. Lucas asked whether they thought Shelby could change enough to become a competent administrator. Of the 15 people who were present, only Dr. Karen Yarbrough, a close associate of Shelby's, voted yes.



Sadly, Shelby was allowed to continue as executive vice president in spite of this overwhelming vote of no confidence until he stepped down following an incident concerning a personnel matter. In spite of the guarantee by Dr. Lucas that Shelby would not be able to take reprisals against us, all of the deans became a target of Shelby's petty vindictiveness.



Some became physically ill as a result; some stepped down and others left the university.




__________________
Gossip Monger

Date:
Permalink Closed

This is precisely the reason I don't believe AKL will emerge from comfortable retirement and take a pro-faculty stance. He didn't do it when he was in a position of power, so why would he do so now?

__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
Permalink Closed

I hope Dr. Lucas will speak out now because (a) he now has nothing to lose; (b) if he speaks out now he has a good chance to emerge as one of the real heroes of this mess; (c) if he fails to speak out now, people will increasingly question his motives and his reputation will be tarnished; (d) like all of us, he is mortal and he should have some interest in how he will be remembered by history.  I am serious about that; think of the people who are now largely forgotten except for their roles in Exit 13.


This remark about being remembered by history gives me a chance, by the way, to put in a plug for the new film about Troy, which (in my opinion) is being unfairly maligned by critics.  Despite some flaws, it is much better than they are suggesting or than I had expected it to be.  Being properly remembered is a major theme of the film. 



__________________
Invictus

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: USM Sympathizer

"I hope Dr. Lucas will speak out now because (a) he now has nothing to lose; (b) if he speaks out now he has a good chance to emerge as one of the real heroes of this mess; (c) if he fails to speak out now, people will increasingly question his motives and his reputation will be tarnished; (d) like all of us, he is mortal and he should have some interest in how he will be remembered by history.  I am serious about that; think of the people who are now largely forgotten except for their roles in Exit 13.
"


If AKL speaks now, he will demolish whatever chance, however remote, that his daughter has of being president of USM at some point in the future. IHL board members serve ridiculously long terms. Don't forget that.

__________________
The Shadow

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: Invictus

"

If AKL speaks now, he will demolish whatever chance, however remote, that his daughter has of being president of USM at some point in the future. IHL board members serve ridiculously long terms. Don't forget that.
"


One could make the opposite argument.

__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: The Shadow

" One could make the opposite argument."

Yes, one could.  As an "outside observer" who knows almost none of the people directly involved, I have noticed a number of things.  One of these is that initial references on the board to Dr. Lucas always seemed to be glowing and positive, but that recently the tide has begun to shift.  He seems at real risk now of being remembered as indifferent, or even something worse, to the fate of his alma mater.  If his goal is to see his daughter as the president someday of a truly decent institution of higher learning, he should step forward and show his commitment to academic excellence.  He will thus win the respect not only of people at USM but of academics elsewhere.  There are more top jobs than the one at Hattiesburg.  The Lucas family has a chance here to distinguish itself as a family that puts values before status -- and may thus (paradoxically) enhance its status.

__________________
Invictus

Date:
RE: RE: RE: RE: Suacier, Shelby and Aubrey: KEY po
Permalink Closed


quote:
Originally posted by: The Shadow

"One could make the opposite argument."


Then make it, Shadow!

But the way I see it, Shelby Thames is exactly what the IHL board wanted. The power brokers wanted somebody to whack USM out of the "comprehensive" university category. Shelby is delivering for them in spades. Those guys are delighted. Now, should AKL speak out against Thames, he's insulting the very people he might want to curry favor with later on.



__________________
USM Sympathizer

Date:
RE: Suacier, Shelby and Aubrey: KEY point!
Permalink Closed


Dr. Lucas: see what I mean?  This is how you are coming to be regarded.  Is the cost worth the (possible) benefit?

__________________
LVN

Date:
Permalink Closed

But why does Dr. Lucas' daughter have to be president of USM?  She's president of Millsaps now, is she not?  There is a whole country full of good colleges she could go on to, should she even want to move up.


I will say that I think any woman, even a Lucas, would have a hard time at USM.  I thought that when I saw Ann Hart (one of the candidates against Thames, is now prez at U. of N.Hampshire).  Watching her, I knew she didn't have a prayer.  The only kind of woman who could make it is an ex-Marine D.I. who later joined a convent and became Mother Superior of some tough missionary order, and who coached a little football on the side, all the while being serene and gracious and looking like Ingrid Bergman in that movie. 


Would Dr. Lucas sacrifice the whole university to some possible ambition of his family, an ambition that doesn't even have to exist?



__________________
Invictus

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: LVN

"Would Dr. Lucas sacrifice the whole university to some possible ambition of his family, an ambition that doesn't even have to exist?"


My first reaction was to type the words, "Why not?"

But on second thought, maybe Dr. Lucas approves of what Thames is doing & the methods he uses. Maybe we're all assuming that Dr. Lucas shares "our" view of what the university should be. Maybe he doesn't see Thames as "destroying" USM. Maybe he sees Thames as doing a little much-needed "house cleaning." Lucas kept Thames on in high-ranking positions after it was generally known that Thames didn't have the managerial skills to run an auto parts store.

There is one other possibility: Dr. Lucas simply doesn't give a rat's a$$ what happens.

__________________
Austin Eagle

Date:
Permalink Closed

I only know Dr. Lucas from a couple of brief conversations on campus in the mid 90's, which is to say, not at all. I have friends on the USM faculty who describe him as decent and fair-minded, but meek, even timid. It seems unlikely to me that he'd be willing to leap into the midst of a very ugly fray and risk sullying his own reputation. What's the upside for him, if he were to speak out publicly, or attempt to intervene with the IHL? Another interim presidency? Wouldn't he too become the target of Thames attack dogs, or worse?

__________________
Invictus

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: Austin Eagle

"Another interim presidency? Wouldn't he too become the target of Thames attack dogs, or worse? "


Without Shelby, there are no "attack dogs." The others are just a bunch of mongrels that look intimidating in a pack with their big mean buddy around. Separately, they just look mangey, underfed & rather puny.

Did you see any of them come to the defense of their good friend & colleague Mr. Hanbury? No. Because with him gone, they didn't have to fight so much for the scraps that Shelby leaves when he's done feeding from the HUB cap.

__________________
Austin Eagle

Date:
Permalink Closed

Speaking of Hanbury, his was a remarkably swift disappearing act. He seems to have left without so much as a whimper of protest. Not that it's important now, but I'd sure like to know the details of his execution, er, termination. Perhaps it could be used as a template for the elimination other Thames lackys.

Is it known for certain that the Hanbury dismissal was ordered by the AG, and triggered by his ham-fisted e-mail to the deans?

__________________
Invictus

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:
Originally posted by: Austin Eagle

"Is it known for certain that the Hanbury dismissal was ordered by the AG, and triggered by his ham-fisted e-mail to the deans?"


No one who knows is talking. Perhaps there was some provision for silence in the "settlement." It does look like AG Hood (an elected official, BTW) gave Jack a bigger pair of pants & Jack outgrew them in only a couple of days. One of those cases where a man's head got too big for his britches, which tells you where I think Hanbury's brain is located

__________________
NowYou Know

Date:
Permalink Closed

Now everyone knows the AKL that I have known so well the past 20 years.

Nice man, such a gentlemen, yet he is weak in many ways.

He is now being revealed for who he is and I am sure many on this board, some of whom saw him as our "savior" twice removed, are in mourning over the realization of AKL's failures.

No, he was not a vengeful man like SFT, but he hurt lots of people by never ever going against the lieutenants and colnels below him..........even when they were dead wrong........ and even when he knew they broke the rules.

Aubrey ALWAYS covered for the bad people below him, that "code of silence" for administrators another poster brought up. That was his downfall.

While AKL did wonderful things like initiate faculty governance with the Facutly Senate as one example, he was often petty in a different way that SFT. AKL did not have "vendettas" but he never once went against his commanders below him, even when they committed gross viololations of the faculty handbook. AKL was not above lying to cover his subordinates, even as he deliberated as a statesman and a gentleman. Odd mixture was AKL.

Now, sadly, the board sees who he really is, working weakly behind the scenes but no one listens to him. He was jerked around the IHL for 22 years, and he was happy to scarf up the "scraps" on the table that Ole Miss and MSU allowed him to have.

USM did pretty well with that model, and he even had salaries well above the other two, if you did not count summer pay. One way Aubrey did that was to fool around with funny money and to postpone any investment in technology. That caused much of the Fleming/McGowan problems.

I can hear many of AKL's supporters wimpering right now, for he was a good man, who compared to SFT did good things for USM, given his limitations.

He is hurt now and he grieves for USM but he will do nothing. It is not in his nature.


__________________
educator

Date:
Permalink Closed

Okay, I'll jump first.  Thank you for, what I can only believe to be, a true assessment of Lucas's core values when it comes to this university. I personally go back and forth about what I think about him now.  His legacy has been obviously undercut by his unwillingless to save this university from overall academic censure.  It probably pains him, but then again, Aubrey -- you have determined your own legacy. What a waste.



__________________
Current DOD

Date:
Easy, People-
Permalink Closed


The higher ed environment was very different when AKL was President.  Plus, he's retired, and deservedly so. To call him to action at this point is very short sighted. We need an outsider as President, no questions asked. Will this work in Mississippi?  Maybe not.  But I'd rather go down fighting.  At the very least we can point at what happened and say "I told you so."


Not being from MS, I don't have a dog in the hunt.  I love USM and hope that it reaches what it could be. But in the long run, it's not going to hurt my family if the higher ed environment in the state suffers b/c of what happens now.


The other universities in the state have nothing to lose from this, because we all know that public perception (nationally & internationally) of them is not going to change one bit, even if they gain from this in the short term. No way they will ever become competetive comprehensive research universities, ever. MS's population will never support a major medical research center & the ag & engineering coverage in the state is overshadowed by more prominent programs like UF, UGA, GA TECH, etc.


But if they bring us down, bring them all down with us.  Make every effort possible to convince students, foundations, donors, to channel their efforts out of state-


 



__________________
cockeyedoptimist

Date:
RE: RE: Suacier, Shelby and Aubrey: KEY point!
Permalink Closed


  Reference is made a lot to a national search and an outsider-Has USM ever had someone from outside the South at the helm or in an upper level administrative position? Has it ever had a president from outside Mississippi except for Fleming who didn't fare well. I ask because I don't know, and I also would like to get the very best no matter where he/she is from-but could an outsider work with the system, understand the culture, be accepted in the long term particularly if this person is a change agent? And does the university need a change agent now or someone to "maintain the organization" after this heady period of turmoil? 

__________________
BogusBoy

Date:
Permalink Closed

Notes about AKL's career, taken from Univ. Libraries web site:


http://www.lib.usm.edu/~archives/usmhist.htm


On July 1, 1975, Dr. Aubrey Keith Lucas became the sixth president of USM. Dr. Lucas had a long history at USM, having served as instructor, Director of Admissions, Registrar, and Dean of the Graduate School. He was also an alumnus. Numerous accomplishments punctuated the Lucas years. Among them were institution of a system of vice presidents; establishment of the School of Library Science; institution of the Honors College; formation of the Teaching and Learning Resource Center; creation of the Faculty Senate; establishment of the Center for International Education; replacement of the quarter system with the semester system; creation of the Polymer Science Institute; reorganization of the University's ten schools into six Colleges; formation of the Institute for Learning in Retirement; and affiliation with Conference USA. Notable additions to the Physical Plant were The R. C. Cook University Union, The Speech and Hearing Building, M. M. Roberts Stadium expansion, the C. W. Woods Art Gallery, the Chain Technology Center, the Polymer Science Building, the Payne Fitness Center, and a five-story addition to Cook Library. In 1995, a donation to the University of $150,000 produced spectacular results. The money was donated by Hattiesburg laundress, Miss Oseola McCarty, and represented the majority of her life's savings. No one could have predicted the local, national, and international response to her selfless act. Miss McCarty received countless awards, including the Presidential Citizen's Medal, and her name became a household word. By association, USM also became a household word. Dr. Lucas stepped down from the presidency on December 31, 1996. As President Emeritus, he maintains an office in the William D. McCain Library and Archives.


Aubrey Lucas anecdote: The following observations regarding Dr. Lucas are credited to Dr. Clyde Ginn. "I have never known that man to tell a lie, even when it would probably benefit him." "He doesn't believe gossip", Ginn added. "If you can't verify it, don't bother to tell him."


Ummm..... Get Ginn or anyone to tell this same tale about SFT.



__________________
truth4usm/AH

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: BogusBoy

"Aubrey Lucas anecdote: The following observations regarding Dr. Lucas are credited to Dr. Clyde Ginn. "I have never known that man to tell a lie, even when it would probably benefit him." "He doesn't believe gossip", Ginn added. "If you can't verify it, don't bother to tell him." Ummm..... Get Ginn or anyone to tell this same tale about SFT."

Yep, that one's already been blown by SFT's ready acceptance of the "rumor" about Doug Chambers on March 8.  What a petty, vindictive little man SFT is.

__________________
Outward Bound

Date:
Permalink Closed

Lucas did not start the Honors College, Dr. McCain did in 1965, with the first 'class' starting in 1966. USM has the fifth oldest Honors College in the nation (Michigan State was the first).

__________________
truth4usm/AH

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: Outward Bound

"Lucas did not start the Honors College, Dr. McCain did in 1965, with the first 'class' starting in 1966. USM has the fifth oldest Honors College in the nation (Michigan State was the first). "

I believe it is the sixth oldest (that's what's in all the recruitment literature that I could find).  It was started as an Honors Program in the 50s.  Dr. Lucas was a great friend to the HC, that I can attest to.

__________________
cockeyedoptimist

Date:
Permalink Closed

  I posted this earlier- maybe no one was interested-or maybe it just got lost in the thread-sorry-would like to try again



  Reference is made a lot to a national search and an outsider-Has USM ever had someone from outside the South at the helm or in an upper level administrative position? Has it ever had a president from outside Mississippi except for Fleming who didn't fare well. I ask because I don't know, and I also would like to get the very best no matter where he/she is from-but could an outsider work with the system, understand the culture, be accepted in the long term particularly if this person is a change agent? And does the university need a change agent now or someone to "maintain the organization" after this heady period of turmoil? 



__________________
Str8uptruth

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: LVN

"But why does Dr. Lucas' daughter have to be president of USM?  She's president of Millsaps now, is she not?  There is a whole country full of good colleges she could go on to, should she even want to move up. I will say that I think any woman, even a Lucas, would have a hard time at USM.  I thought that when I saw Ann Hart (one of the candidates against Thames, is now prez at U. of N.Hampshire).  Watching her, I knew she didn't have a prayer.  The only kind of woman who could make it is an ex-Marine D.I. who later joined a convent and became Mother Superior of some tough missionary order, and who coached a little football on the side, all the while being serene and gracious and looking like Ingrid Bergman in that movie.  Would Dr. Lucas sacrifice the whole university to some possible ambition of his family, an ambition that doesn't even have to exist?"

Mississippi is so behind in times... It is time that a Mississippi University have a woman president. I know just the woman to fit the bill!!!

__________________
Str8uptruth

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: LVN

"But why does Dr. Lucas' daughter have to be president of USM?  She's president of Millsaps now, is she not?  There is a whole country full of good colleges she could go on to, should she even want to move up. I will say that I think any woman, even a Lucas, would have a hard time at USM.  I thought that when I saw Ann Hart (one of the candidates against Thames, is now prez at U. of N.Hampshire).  Watching her, I knew she didn't have a prayer.  The only kind of woman who could make it is an ex-Marine D.I. who later joined a convent and became Mother Superior of some tough missionary order, and who coached a little football on the side, all the while being serene and gracious and looking like Ingrid Bergman in that movie.  Would Dr. Lucas sacrifice the whole university to some possible ambition of his family, an ambition that doesn't even have to exist?"

I guess my point was.....I beg to differ on your opinion about a woman not fitting the bill for Prez!!

__________________
str8uptruth

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: USM Sympathizer

"Yes, one could.  As an "outside observer" who knows almost none of the people directly involved, I have noticed a number of things.  One of these is that initial references on the board to Dr. Lucas always seemed to be glowing and positive, but that recently the tide has begun to shift.  He seems at real risk now of being remembered as indifferent, or even something worse, to the fate of his alma mater.  If his goal is to see his daughter as the president someday of a truly decent institution of higher learning, he should step forward and show his commitment to academic excellence.  He will thus win the respect not only of people at USM but of academics elsewhere.  There are more top jobs than the one at Hattiesburg.  The Lucas family has a chance here to distinguish itself as a family that puts values before status -- and may thus (paradoxically) enhance its status."


If his goal is to see his daughter as the president someday of a truly decent institution of higher learning.....


Dr. Frances Lucas is already a president of a very wonder institute of higher learning-- Milsaps...HELLO!!!! She is not only a wonderful president, but she has the highest standards of integrity.  She is the definition of a great leader.



__________________
Grey Knight

Date:
Permalink Closed

I am all for a woman to be the next president of USM, as long as she does not have the name Lucas in her name somewhere. I understand from my Millsaps friends that she is about as welcome there as Shelby is here. The alumni are drying up their checkbooks as long as she remains at Millsaps.

__________________
str8uptruth

Date:
Permalink Closed


quote:




Originally posted by: Grey Knight
"At the bottom I have copied a salient portion of Gene Saucier's letter in Sunday's HA. One of the things I was waiting to see if anyone would make a comment on was the real tragedy of AKL and his lack of leadership for USM. And one of the reasons I think Shelby 'owns' Aubrey, even back then. Aubrey gave his word that Shelby would not be allow to retaliate against the Deans and VP's. Yet, according to Gene Saucier, Shelby had free reign to spew his venom. Aubrey did nothing to protect these people even after he had given them his guarantee.     At the close of the discussion Dr. Lucas asked whether they thought Shelby could change enough to become a competent administrator. Of the 15 people who were present, only Dr. Karen Yarbrough, a close associate of Shelby's, voted yes. Sadly, Shelby was allowed to continue as executive vice president in spite of this overwhelming vote of no confidence until he stepped down following an incident concerning a personnel matter. In spite of the guarantee by Dr. Lucas that Shelby would not be able to take reprisals against us, all of the deans became a target of Shelby's petty vindictiveness. Some became physically ill as a result; some stepped down and others left the university.


 



Gene Saucier....hmmmm. Not to be taking up for Thames, but I don't think he and Yarbrough were that close.  You might want to check and see if that is indeed a fact.

__________________
str8uptruth

Date:
Permalink Closed

quote:

Originally posted by: Grey Knight

"I am all for a woman to be the next president of USM, as long as she does not have the name Lucas in her name somewhere. I understand from my Millsaps friends that she is about as welcome there as Shelby is here. The alumni are drying up their checkbooks as long as she remains at Millsaps."

I am glad to see that Grey. I wish there were more open-minded people like you around. I know the perfect woman leader that USM needs, but at this point she might kill me if I even mention her name. 

__________________
Grey Knight

Date:
Permalink Closed

Please mention her name and I will check the troll section of the obits to see if our burden has been lightened.

__________________
STR8UPTRUTH

Date:
Permalink Closed

:quote:

Originally posted by: Grey Knight

"Please mention her name and I will check the troll section of the obits to see if our burden has been lightened."

        :)

__________________
LVN

Date:
Permalink Closed

I think my comments about a potential woman president were quite misunderstood.  The list of qualifications was tongue-in-cheek, to say the least.  There is a whole world of fantastic women who could be prez, it's that in many respects it's still the 1950's around here, and even a strong and effective woman will have a hard row to hoe.  That does not mean that I wouldn't be all for the right woman; in fact there are a lot of ways in which it might be the ideal solution.  I don't know what kind of leader Ann Hart is, but in our meeting she was gracious and professional.  In the meeting with Dr. Thames, as I have related earlier, he took the list of questions out of the facilitator's hands and conducted his own session.  It made Dr. Hart look very good to that auditorium full of women.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard